The
statements made by P. J. Masten, a former Playboy bunny, smell of
inconsistencies. Not only is she using the same m. o. as the other women who
accused Bill Cosby, but her allegations are sound contradictory.
First she says that she
was given liquor and does remember anything after that. That could
be a sign of being drunk. (I’m not saying conclusively that she was drunk;
I state it as a possibility.) When she woke up she said she was beside a naked
man and
that she did not remember anything after the drink. She claimed absolutely that
she knew she was raped. That sounds conflicting. If she doesn’t remember
anything after the drink, how can she be so definitive that it was rape? When
someone is drunk, they do not remember what they did, and they are doing it of
their own free will and may very well not be recalled.
She is also the same
woman who accused Marv Albert. If she was so definite about Cosby, how could
she allow herself to get into the same situation with someone else?
She decided to say speak
about Cosby after 15 year old Judy Huth accused Cosby about a sexual assault at
the Playboy Mansion in 1974. This one is really hard to believe because a 15
year old should be at the Playboy Mansion in the first place.
Then she said that
there are at least a dozen other former bunnies with similar stories. This
could very well be a comment where the accuser just picked a number and made it
large.
This is one accusation that I cannot believe. Sounds like someone jumping on the bus trying get away with another copycat accusation. I’m not making an
absolute conclusion. This is just an opinion based on the accuser’s comments and I am not making a judgment.
No comments:
Post a Comment